The case reported below is typical of the treatment of fathers in court by our degenerate judges.
If a mother wishes to take the children abroad, there are no UK regulations or procedures to stop her. However, under the international Hague Convention she can be required to return them to the country they were living in, for the courts of that country to decide their fate. Children are regularly returned to the UK under this Convention. Almost always however, the judges in the UK then give permission for the mother to immediately take them abroad again.
So the only effects of this Convention and process are to cost time, stress and huge amounts of money, especially for the father. And to the benefit of lawyers. And to give the father no rights. The children's lives are disrupted, as they are moved around rapidly. Their lives are seriouly damaged, as is their father's, as all usually never see each other again. The mother is the only person who gets what she wants, usually at no personal cost to herself.
In the real story reported below, the father spent £40,000 on his case, possibly all his life savings, but was given no protection. The lawyers obviously earned £40,000 for ensuring that degenerate principles determined the case.
In the same week it was also reported (see below) that three female judges sat together and alone for the first time in the Court of Appeal. About these, it is believed :
Butler-Sloss has been President of the Family Division for some years, so must carry responsibility for current practices,
Hale has written questioning the usefulness of marriage, and was we believe a major architect of the Family Law Act 1996 which attempted to build the 'no-fault' principle into written law,
while we have no information about Arden, we cannot assume she would have influence in the company of the other two.
Acknowledgement : The Daily Telegraph, Wednesday 14 February 2001
Acknowledgement : The Daily Telegraph, Tuesday 13 February 2001
Comment : is there a coincidence in these two reports ?