Name them and shame them

We identify those people who, we believe, have contributed in some way to the issues of concern to men and fathers and the UKMM, and describe their contributions.

The judges (we believe corrupt and degenerate judges) responsible for 'no-fault' divorce

We start by highlighting the judges who carry the most responsibility for the destruction of men's rights in matrimonial and family law. This has primarily been through the introduction of 'no-fault' divorce. These judges have ignored the written law in doing this, so that the interpretation of law is not as Parliament required, nor as any members of the public have requested, or have been consulted about, or even informed of. This has been the single most evil corruption of law that the UK has ever seen. These judges have we believe acted illegally, and so should be brought to justice. Unfortunately they can't be as most of them are recently dead. But fortunately are therefore beyond doing any more evil or damage to our country. As this issue is so important for men's rights, we outline the history and identify the main culprits.

The judges firstly introduced a 'no-fault' divorce principle into children's issues. That is, they decided that the behaviour of the two parties need not be investigated or considered to determine what happens to the children, i.e. who obtains custody and any contact (and hence child maintenance) issues. They used the principle that the children's interests should be paramount i.e. above considerations of justice for the two parents. The case of Allen v. Allen [1948] 2 AER 413 CA, is a pivotal case precedent, and was heard by Wrottesly and Evershed L.JJ in 1948 in the Court of Appeal.

This evil development was followed secondly in 1973 by the introduction of the 'no-fault' divorce principle into financial issues by Mr Justice Ormrod in Wachtel v. Wachtel [1973] 1 AER 113 FD. This vastly unjust decision was rightly appealed, but Lord Denning, in the Court of Appeal [1973] 1 AER 829 CA, supported Ormrod's evil precedent. This completed the corruption needed to totally remove men's rights in marriage, and which is currently responsible for the wrecking of the lives of so many innocent men each year.

Not content with these developments, in the 1990s Brenda Hoggett, otherwise known as Mrs Justice Hale or Dame Brenda Hale, attempted to build the no-fault principle into the written law in the Family Law Act 1996 (FLA96). This step would have firmed up the illegal practices into statute i.e written law. She was then a member of the Law Commission, the body which proposes new or revised laws, often without public consultation - a body which had clearly by then been infiltrated by feminists. The section of FLA96 specifically dealing with 'no-fault' divorce, due to be implemented about 2000, was not introduced due to unknown causes, which may have included the Cheltenham Group's submission to the UN Human Rights Commission in 1999. However she continues as a judge in the Court of Appeal, and we believe she must be removed from this position. Anyone appearing in front or her should quote article 6.1 of the European Convention together with her history of amending the law without public approval, as we believe she cannot be part of any 'impartial tribunal', as article 6.1 of the Convention requires.

Other significant judges are :

Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss was until 2005, the judge with most responsibility, as President of the Family Division, and Chair of the Family Justice Committee that was set up to advise Parliament about family law. Due to her previously unique position, and the fact that after retiring from being a judge she has chosen to go on a lecture tour to promote her ideas, we have a separate section on this website which assesses her 'contribution' to family justice.

And it's important to understand how the situation is reported in the press. An article in The Daily Telegraph of Thurs 13 Feb 2003, with our analysis, illustrates this : Rozenburg and Sloss.

The UK senior matrimonial & family law judges : degenerate judges.

The judge who sent a man to jail for something which was not a crime : Lord Keith of Kinkel.

And miscellaneous others about whom we have evidence :

Blatant malpratice by Judge Parry.

And disgraceful behaviour by Judge James Munby.

The interference in private arrangements, certainly a violation of article 8 (respect for private life) of ECHR is very clear in this case by Lord Justice Thorpe.

Unfortunately we have to include Judges at the European Court of Human Rights.

It is important to understand how judges have assumed the role of both law makers and law enforcers. Further, that they are doing this without consulting the public whose lives are affected, and are transferring control of children from parents to themselves in the process. We take a typical example of a Judges & Lawyers Congress which makes this clear. We call this process and situation 'tyranny', as no democratic mechanism is involved.

The lawyers who are complicit in what is going on :

A blatant case of solicitors behaviour, against which the man had no remedy in court : a feminist solicitor / District Judge Bullock

A typical initial letter which men receive from solicitors with the deserting wife's demands : Freeman Johnson Solicitors

Miscellaneous people who carry varying degrees of responsibility for separate issues :

Some people who have a lot to answer for :

Roy 'Woy' Jenkins

The UK's Human Genetics Commission proposes that it should be a criminal offence for men to obtain DNA paternity tests on children they may suspect are not their own. The Chairperson is Lady Helena Kennedy, a prominent female barrister.

Several members from the 'do gooders' groups :

John Habgood, Patron, National Family Mediation

Jeffrey Blumenfeld, Director, Jewish Marriage Council

Rosemary Carter, Chair, Solicitors Family Law Association

Mary Corbett, Chief Executive, Catholic Marriage Care

Nora David, Vice-Chair, All Party Parlisamentary Group on Children

Ed Straw, Chair, Relate.

The Labour cabinet of 14 January 2001.

British Airways have a policy about male passengers.

Forshaws Solicitors, Warrington & elsewhere. Shocking advertising campaign against fathers.

The press and media have a lot to answer for,

in not treating these issues seriously :